Freeze Frame answers
You saw a shirt for $97. You didn’t have the cash, so you borrowed $50 from your mum and $50 from your dad = $100. You bought the shirt, and had $3 change. You gave your dad $1 and your mum $1 and kept the other $1 for yourself. Now you owe your mum $49 and your dad $49. 49+49 = 98 + your $1 = 99. Where is the missing $1?

alexandraerin:

these-shackleson:

bethosaurus:

most-awkward-moments:

Rage comics, ‘when’ moments, memes, gifs- this blog has it all!

better question

what the fuck are you doing buying a shirt that costs 97 dollars

i hate this “math problem.”

so you pay 100, cost is 97 so you get 3 in change.

total cost was 97 ÷ 2 people to pay back = 48.5 each

so if you give them each 1 dollar change, that’s 49.50 each, times 2 is 99 total, and the remaining dollar goes to you. which is pretty rude anyway.

this is really dumb because it’s not even tricky. it’s not like it’s some crazy riddle with multiple possibilities. it’s worded misleadingly but it’s simple arithmetic.

i’m judging you really hard if you can’t figure it out.

…this doesn’t change the fact that a simple matter, but I don’t think pocketing a dollar of the original loans changes the amount “you” owe. The original version of this “math problem” had a three way split and the reason that the “extra” dollar was pocketed was to save the people involved the trouble of fighting over it.

(It also went a little bit further to make it sound confusing. I’m confused as to why I’m supposed to be mystified that someone spent $97 of $100 and had $3 left over.)

Edit:

In fact, this is so far from confusing I have to stop and analyze why it’s supposed to be confusing.

It seems that the trick in the math problem is getting you to think of the $1 cash as both part of the original $100 loan and part of the results of that loan. The breakdown would be like this: “you” borrowed $50 and $50. ($100) You payback $1 and $1, so have $98 in outstanding loans ($49 and $49), which you “spent” on $1 cash and $97 in shirt. $98 and $1 and $1 = $100, nothing unaccounted for.

I hate this “clever” riddle, because it really isn’t clever at all: http://spikedmath.com/334.html

  1. life-sweetlike-cinnamon reblogged this from givingblowjobs
  2. chrysmichelle reblogged this from 2damnfeisty
  3. kingtasia reblogged this from teddythemonster
  4. fronisha reblogged this from teddythemonster
  5. magicalgirlshana reblogged this from teddythemonster
  6. teddythemonster reblogged this from 2damnfeisty
  7. ryanlikesthiss reblogged this from 2damnfeisty
  8. sparkling-blossom reblogged this from jennywren--x
  9. sunnychi101 reblogged this from chocaholic523
  10. chocaholic523 reblogged this from sunnychi101 and added:
    Better question is: Why the fuck would you buy a damn shirt for $97?
  11. ask-the-nobodys reblogged this from kismessitudes
  12. dreaming-up-tomorrow reblogged this from goofypooper
  13. davidov64 reblogged this from sunnychi101 and added:
    Narnia. The dollar is in narnia with Aslan and the socks that don’t return from the wash
  14. secretly-im-britta reblogged this from erinyessaturni
  15. teamseabreeze reblogged this from erinyessaturni and added:
    Okay so what I did is: 50-3 = 47 (Dad) 50 (Mom) 50+47 = 97 with 3 left over, which is split up and given to three...
  16. erinyessaturni reblogged this from tisne-inkwell
  17. tisne-inkwell reblogged this from kismessitudes
  18. not-fedora reblogged this from durkin62
  19. goofypooper reblogged this from durkin62
  20. sirobvious reblogged this from durkin62
  21. durkin62 reblogged this from kismessitudes and added:
    This is a word problem, not a math problem. You’re trying to get to 97 dollars, not 100. The original price of the...
  22. kismessitudes reblogged this from jennywren--x